APIAssert vs Runscope
Runscope (now part of BlazeMeter) is a comprehensive API testing and monitoring platform. Here's how it compares to APIAssert.
Overview
| Feature | APIAssert | Runscope |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | API monitoring | API testing + monitoring |
| Setup Complexity | Simple, point-and-click | Feature-rich, steeper learning |
| GraphQL | First-class support | Via HTTP requests |
| Multi-step Tests | Single endpoint | Complex flows supported |
| Pricing | Starts at $9/mo | Enterprise pricing |
When to Choose APIAssert
Choose APIAssert if you need:
- Quick setup — monitors running in minutes
- Straightforward monitoring — health checks, not complex flows
- GraphQL support — native query validation
- Affordable pricing — transparent per-monitor pricing
- Developer-friendly — focused on what matters
APIAssert is built for teams who want effective API monitoring without the complexity of a full testing platform.
When to Choose Runscope
Choose Runscope if you need:
- Complex test scenarios — multi-step, stateful flows
- API traffic inspection — debug live API traffic
- Enterprise features — SAML, audit logs, compliance
- Existing BlazeMeter investment — unified platform
- Comprehensive testing — beyond just monitoring
Runscope is a powerful enterprise platform for teams with complex API testing needs.
Feature Comparison
Monitoring Capabilities
APIAssert:
- ✅ REST API monitoring (all methods)
- ✅ GraphQL queries and mutations
- ✅ JSONPath assertions
- ✅ Header validation
- ✅ Response time monitoring
- ✅ Multi-region checks (6 regions)
Runscope:
- ✅ REST API monitoring
- ✅ Multi-step test flows
- ✅ Variable extraction & chaining
- ✅ Conditional logic
- ✅ Pre/post request scripts
- ✅ Global assertions
Assertions
APIAssert:
- Point-and-click assertion builder
- JSONPath expressions
- Response time thresholds
- Status code validation
- Header checks
Runscope:
- JavaScript-based assertions
- JSON Schema validation
- Response body parsing
- Variable comparison
- Complex logic support
Setup Experience
APIAssert:
- Enter URL
- Configure headers/auth
- Add assertions via builder
- Set interval
- Monitor live in 2 minutes
Runscope:
- Create bucket (test container)
- Create test
- Add request steps
- Configure assertions
- Set up schedule
- Longer setup, more options
Pricing
APIAssert:
| Plan | Price | Monitors |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo | 3 monitors |
| Pro | $9/mo | 20 monitors |
| Team | $29/mo | 100 monitors |
Runscope/BlazeMeter:
- Enterprise pricing (contact sales)
- Previously ~$79/mo for basic plans
- Now bundled with BlazeMeter
Note: Runscope pricing has changed since the BlazeMeter acquisition
Use Case Comparison
Simple Health Monitoring
Goal: Check if APIs are up and returning expected data
APIAssert: ✅ Ideal
- 2-minute setup
- Point-and-click assertions
- Immediate alerts
Runscope: Works but overkill
- More setup required
- Designed for complex scenarios
- Higher cost for simple monitoring
Complex API Flows
Goal: Test login → create order → verify order → cleanup
Runscope: ✅ Built for this
- Multi-step tests
- Variable passing between steps
- Conditional logic
- Pre/post scripts
APIAssert: Not ideal
- Single endpoint per monitor
- Better suited for independent checks
- Would need multiple monitors
API Traffic Debugging
Goal: Inspect live API traffic for debugging
Runscope: ✅ Unique feature
- Traffic inspection (Runscope Radar)
- Debug webhooks
- Trace API calls
APIAssert: Not available
- Focus is on monitoring, not debugging
- Use dedicated tools for debugging
Real-World Scenarios
Scenario: Microservices Health Checks
APIAssert:
- Create monitor per service endpoint
- Check health, response time, response body
- Multi-region for latency awareness
- Alert per service via Slack/PagerDuty
Runscope:
- Create test bucket per service
- Add comprehensive test suites
- Include dependency checks
- More setup, more thorough
Scenario: Payment Flow Testing
Runscope: Better fit
- Create payment intent
- Capture variables (payment_id)
- Confirm payment
- Verify webhook receipt
- Check final state
APIAssert: Limited
- Can monitor individual endpoints
- Can't chain requests with variables
- Would need separate integration testing
Migration Considerations
Moving from Runscope to APIAssert
If your Runscope usage is primarily simple monitoring:
- Identify simple monitors that check single endpoints
- Export assertion logic (translate to JSONPath)
- Create monitors in APIAssert with equivalent assertions
- Keep complex flows in Runscope if needed
- Run parallel for a week to verify coverage
Keep Runscope For
- Multi-step test flows
- Traffic inspection needs
- Complex enterprise requirements
- Existing test suite investment
Move to APIAssert For
- Simple health checks
- GraphQL monitoring
- Cost-effective monitoring
- Quick setup and maintenance
The Bottom Line
Runscope (BlazeMeter) is a powerful, enterprise-grade API testing platform. It excels at complex multi-step test scenarios, traffic inspection, and comprehensive API testing workflows.
APIAssert is focused on continuous API monitoring with minimal complexity. If you need straightforward health checks with response validation, APIAssert offers a simpler, more affordable solution.
Choose based on your needs:
- Complex API testing → Runscope/BlazeMeter
- Continuous API monitoring → APIAssert
- Both needs → Use both for their strengths
Try APIAssert free — no credit card required.